| ▲ | reaperducer 2 days ago |
| [flagged] |
|
| ▲ | 999900000999 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| If I want to spin up a CI/CD pipeline to build an Android app that takes 30 seconds. I send you or anyone else the link and you can test it out. With Apple I need to beg for my dev account to be approved, pay 100$ a year, and submit it via test flight. If more than X numbers of people use it , ohh no I have to publish it via the app store. If it pleases King Cook, may I publish a game for my friends to play. Google is starting to restrict Android too, custom system roms aren't as popular anymore, but theirs still a sense it's my phone. With Apple, it's still Apple's phone, you've just purchased a revokable license to use it in accordance with the terms you agreed to. |
|
| ▲ | lukeschlather 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > It's bad enough that I've had at least a dozen apps disappear from my iDevices over the years because the companies running them went out of business, pivoted, exited, or otherwise disappeared or stopped supporting their product. The last thing I want is for an entire app store's worth of apps to suddenly go away. This happens just the same on iOS when Apple drops support for a device. First-party stores are not a defense against this. It's theoretically easier to plan for, but you're still at the mercy of Apple's support window. Once upon a time you could download an app and it would work indefinitely, but that's not the way any modern app-store based systems really work. What Amazon is doing here is probably less impactful than when Apple kills certain APIs and breaks a bunch of apps with an update. (I'm certain Amazon and Apple both do estimated math about the number of devices/apps/users they're breaking, and I'm also certain just based on volume that Amazon is breaking fewer people/apps with this change than Apple does routinely.) |
|
| ▲ | thesuitonym 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's my understanding that the majority of people who want alternative app stores for iOS don't necessarily want something like an Amazon App Store, but rather something like F-Droid. I would love to be able to install weird, open source apps on my iPhone, the same way I could on my Android phones. |
|
| ▲ | 10729287 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Totally agree, but unfortunately people (forgive and) forget and that's why those companies keep on doing this. I myself forgot Microsoft once (cough) sold e-books. |
| |
| ▲ | Uvix 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Did Microsoft ever sell directly? They had Microsoft Reader but I thought all the stores were third-party. However, Amazon did at one point in time sell ebooks in multiple formats pre-Kindle, one of which was Microsoft Reader. (I assume the others were PDF and Mobipocket.) So they have form for closing up shop and killing access to purchases like this. | |
| ▲ | evilduck 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | PlaysForSure was also a great name. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | CivBase 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don't follow this logic. Amazon did something bad on their app store so now walled gardens are good? |
| |
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | reaperducer 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don't follow this logic. Amazon did something bad on their app store so now walled gardens are good? No, the logic is that several large companies (Amazon, Apple, Microsoft) have done bad things on their app store, so no stores can be trusted. But for me, I trust a big name store more than I trust an small unknown store. | | |
| ▲ | CivBase 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I'm not sure what "small unknown" stores you might be referring to. Surely Amazon qualifies as a "big name" store same as Apple or Google, right? Clearly this event shows a big name is not an indication of consumer protection. | | |
| ▲ | reaperducer a day ago | parent [-] | | Surely Amazon qualifies as a "big name" store same as Apple or Google, right? Yes. That's why I listed it right next to Apple and Microsoft in my response. https://www.rif.org | | |
| ▲ | CivBase a day ago | parent [-] | | Yeah I read that. Your comment about "small unknown stores" threw me off because none of the parties involved with this story are small so I'm not sure what it has to do with the discussion. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | 9question1 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Walled gardens are good because if you insist on picking your fruits only from the wilderness due to moral principles you're gonna get mauled by a bear some time. Sure, you might prioritize feeling morally superior, but the majority of society is more practical | | |
| ▲ | Shawnecy 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | This is an absurd false dichotomy. You can pick fruits from the wilderness and not get mauled by bears. Using apps not in walled gardens has nothing to do with attempts to feel morally superior. | |
| ▲ | jasonjayr 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You teach people to stay the hell away from bears, and everyone is better for it. | | |
| ▲ | jmb99 2 days ago | parent [-] | | So the moral here is, only use alternative app stores that are run by companies larger than Amazon? |
| |
| ▲ | CivBase 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Isn't the better analogy that you insist on being able to get fruits from anywhere - including neighboring towns or the wild - and not just the local marketplace? Yeah I could get mauled by a bear if I get my fruits from the wild. But that's probably not a risk with the vendor from a neighboring town. And if there's a fruit I can only get from the wild, who are you to tell me I can't have it? Maybe I get mauled by a bear. Maybe I get robbed in the neighboring town. But what else am I to do when what I want isn't available at the local marketplace? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | mattl 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Or when Microsoft closed their music store. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSN_Music |
