▲ | sul_tasto 2 days ago | |||||||
The electoral college was intended to serve this purpose. | ||||||||
▲ | ckozlowski 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I really wanted to believe that it would step up to the occasion, but twice now, it didn't. I don't say such lightly. I genuinely believe that up until very recently, all portents of doom aside, none of the prior elected presidents truly threatened the Republic. Not Bush, not Obama, none of them. Trump has been the exception. It the electoral college had been working as intended when it was envisioned by the Founders, it would have said "Yeah, I hear you want Trump, but, no." and voted in someone who might be better suited to implement his (rough) ideas. I'm not completely onboard with the notion of abolishing said college just yet, as I believe that the electoral system prevents a candidate from say, simply winning all of the urban areas, or exploiting some similar demographic divide that would could exist in a pure popular vote system. We're a union of states, not a single monolithic country. And while I might place my bets on a popular vote providing me the results I'd like a majority of the time, I believe broad representation that at least aids towards unity is better than an outright majority. We strive to avoid "tyranny of the majority". I don't have any easy or simple answers as to what might fix all of this. It may not even be something our "system" can fix, but rather just a lesson we as a country have to learn. Let's hope it's not as painful as prior instances. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | mrtesthah 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
The purpose of the electoral college was to protect slavery. | ||||||||
|