| ▲ | matwood 2 days ago | |||||||
Except DOGE (at the time of this article) kept their claim of saving $8B and pointed at the old contract to make their stats look better. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/18/upshot/doge-contracts-mus... The DOGE website initially included a screenshot from the federal contracting database showing that the contract’s value was $8 million, even as the DOGE site listed $8 billion in savings. On Tuesday night, around the time this article was published, DOGE removed the screenshot that showed the mismatch, but continued to claim $8 billion in savings. It added a link to the original, outdated version of the contract worth $8 billion. Trustworthy and transparent. I guess fixing a typo is worth $8B? | ||||||||
| ▲ | FergusArgyll 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
"By examining past versions of the contract listed on the Federal Procurement Data System, The Upshot determined that the federal award, approved in September 2022, had initially listed a total value of $8 billion. But on Jan. 22 this year, that figure was updated to $8 million... It's possible that DOGE or someone else in the Trump administration can claim credit for fixing the error in the contracting database, given that the value was downgraded to $8 million two days after President Trump took office. " -NYT TFA So Bureaucracy incompetence, mistake is around for >2 years, DOGE fixes it. Screenshot and FPDS DB were out of sync, "PDS posting of the final termination notices can have up to a 1-month lag." | ||||||||
| ||||||||