| Funny thing is that kind of government foreign aid is the kind of soft-power over smaller countries thing that right-wingers politicians love, or at least used to. Similar to the BS that China pulls with the belt and road initiative (but probably not as bad in most instances). Basically give/loan money, get international political support back. Use political support to bully international institutions (UN, WTO, WHO, etc) to do what you want. I guess soft-power is not enough anymore, they want all the power. |
| |
| ▲ | DanielHB 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | International aid is such a cheap way to get soft-power while also being able to, you know, help people. Even if a lot of it is misused or inefficiently used the soft-power is there. A lot of that soft-power has been spent on getting other countries to be more democratic, which is a good thing. Although I don't doubt it has been used for bad reasons as well. | |
| ▲ | DanielHB 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The funny thing is just how inverted the situation is, for years leftists were saying that this kind of foreign aid is often used to hold small countries hostage. While the right wanted to keep the soft-power the aid gives and claiming this kind of aid is used to keep countries democratic. Now the right is "screw soft-power" and the left is "think of the children". And in the middle people suffering like always. The worse part is that a lot/most of that aid is probably of very benign influence, but it is definitely also used for nefarious reasons. | | |
| ▲ | ZeroGravitas 2 days ago | parent [-] | | This is dangerous sanewashing. When Trump attacks USAID (or the CIA or the FBI) from the nationalist authoritarian right, it in no way counterbalances people criticizing it from the left. In particular, the left criticism of USAID were always "think of the children" because they wanted it to do that more and better. They have remained consistent in that. |
| |
| ▲ | troupo 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | The "traditional right wing" has been vocal about many things over the years. Nearly every single one has bent their knee. | | |
| ▲ | amanaplanacanal 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Conservatism is pretty much dead in the US. It's all about cults of personality and grievance now. Oh, and of course, graft. | | |
| ▲ | soraminazuki 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Conservatism before Trump was George W Bush, and while they're very different, it definitely wasn't all sunshine and roses. I don't remember a time in my lifetime when conservatism represented anything good. | | |
| ▲ | amanaplanacanal 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm a boomer, so I at least remember a time when it was at least more consistently about some sort of values. The Republican party has been through so many changes since then. | | |
| ▲ | ModernMech 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | However, my entire life Republicans have been the party the KKK is happy to vote for. For a long time that was dismissed as not a problem because they were seen as a fringe, but people pointed out that if your party platform is attractive to the KKK, that is a problem -- you have to kick those people out or they invite their friends and their friends bring worse and worse people. Lo and behold, the KKK contingent took over the entire party, to the point Liz Cheney (of all people) got kicked out. And the KKK, neo-Nazis, neo-feudalists, Christian nationalists fringes banded together in common cause. So yes, the Republican party doesn't look like it did 40 years ago, but at the same time it looks exactly like it did 40 years ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
