Remix clone Hacker News

What makes you think so, exactly? It's not like CIA would let everyone within the organisation know they are doing it. Do you think USAID could just say no to CIA?

▲

throwawaymaths 2 days ago | parent [-]

IF YOU ARE INVOLVED WITH LYING TO PEOPLE AND NOT ADMINISTERING VACCINES AND DOING DNA TESTS, THEN IT IS YOUR INDVIDUAL DUTY TO STOP YOUR ORG FROM CONTINUING.

▲

gambiting 2 days ago | parent [-]

....what happened with your capslock?

Again, do you think the head of USAID could have just told the head of CIA "no we're not doing this"?

What makes you think they were informed at all? That's kind of the entire MO of CIA - they don't inform other agencies what they are doing when it concerns national security, they just go and do it.

▲

throwawaymaths 2 days ago | parent [-]

let me spell it out for you:

If you're a midlevel program manager (or whatever role label they have) at USAID you should be noticing that vaccines are not being given out. If USAID doesn't have the capability to monitor its programs to the point where that level of accountability exists, then it shouldn't exist.

▲

gambiting 2 days ago | parent [-]

Look, we can both play this game - let me spell this out for you the 3rd time

"do you think the head of USAID could have just told the head of CIA "no we're not doing this"?"

>>If USAID doesn't have the capability to monitor its programs to the point where that level of accountability exists

If you think CIA hasn't thought about this and addressed it some other way, then I guess the assumption we're working with is that CIA is literally incompetent at their actual job.

You're barking at the wrong tree. Be angry at CIA for doing this shit, not at USAID for running a program that got hijacked by them.

	▲	throwawaymaths a day ago \| parent [-]
		Yes absolutely they could... as evidenced by the fact that WE FOUND OUT and the CIA got in trouble for it?