Framing it in that way is essentially a get out of jail free card - anyone caught with CSAM can claim it was AI generated by a "clean" model, and how would the prosecution ever be able to prove that it wasn't?

I get where you are coming from but it doesn't seem actionable in any way that doesn't effectively legalize CSAM possession, so I think courts will have no choice but to put the burden of proof on the accused. If you play with fire then you'd better have the receipts.

▲

_aavaa_ 9 months ago | parent [-]

This seems like a long way of saying “guilty until proven innocent”.

▲

jsheard 9 months ago | parent [-]

It is, but that's hardly unprecedented for this type of thing. In commercial porn the legal burden is on the producer to prove that their models were adults, not for prosecutors to prove that they were minors.

	▲	_aavaa_ 9 months ago \| parent [-]
		Ahh did not know. I can see why though.