| ▲ | airstrike 6 hours ago |
| The Supreme Court doesn't. |
|
| ▲ | garbagewoman 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The supreme court says a lot of things. |
| |
| ▲ | airstrike 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. | | |
| ▲ | Spivak 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense. It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. | | |
| ▲ | airstrike 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | By definition, the Supreme Court's decision _is_ the canonical interpretation. Whether you disagree with the decision has no bearing on the matter. And of course it makes sense, because the legal system was created by the very laws it upholds. If you think it should be different, then you'll have to convince a lot of people to change a lot of laws and probably parts of the US constitution |
|
| |
| ▲ | HDThoreaun 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says. |
|
|
| ▲ | cute_boi 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased. |
| |
| ▲ | monocularvision 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”? |
|
