|
| ▲ | necovek 6 months ago | parent | next [-] |
| Weren't phone lines something like RJ11 or RJ12? FWIW, TIL about 8P8C. |
| |
| ▲ | SAI_Peregrinus 6 months ago | parent [-] | | Yes, and RJ45. It used to be defined by the US FCC[1] in 47 CFR Part 68 Subpart F. Along with others, like RJ31X, RJ38, etc. The "RJxxy" numbers were the Universal Service Order Codes (USOCs), the `y` value described the use (e.g. W for wall-mounted jacks). Pages 143 & 144 of the PDF (403 & 404 of the print version) have the electrical connection diagram and the USOCs, pages 125-129 (385 -389 print) have the mechanical drawings. The unkeyed 8p8c connector we use today is also in there (pdf pgs 103-113), but the RJ45 series used the keyed connector! It's RJ31X & RJ38X that used the unkeyed 8-position series jack & 8-position plug we call RJ45 today (pdf pages 137-138). [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20170705131407/http://www.tscm.c... | | |
|
|
| ▲ | formerly_proven 6 months ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Though the pinout was influenced by the phone standards, that’s why the first two pairs are nested into each other in the center, which you obviously wouldn’t do for a high-speed digital interface. |
|
| ▲ | Brian_K_White 6 months ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Similarly, it's DE9 not DB9 |
| |
| ▲ | SAI_Peregrinus 6 months ago | parent [-] | | Yep, and these days ribbon cables are rare, instead we have Flexible Flat Cables or Flexible Printed Circuits. Ribbon cables are the old cables like IDE hard drives used, with insulation displacement connectors, while FFCs and FPCs are much thinner and use integral connection schemes (tinned pads on the cable itself get clamped by some sort of connector on a PCB). |
|