| |
| ▲ | 63 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The power in question is the president's power over the executive branch of government, e.g. the department of Justice. If the president orders it, the department of Justice could choose to feign ignorance and simply not fine any offending parties under this law. Obviously this is an immense power that should be wielded with the utmost care but at this point I'm not sure anyone cares. | |
| ▲ | warner25 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think the idea is that Trump wields enormous (unprecedented?) control over the members of his party, and thus effectively controls both houses of Congress for at least the next two years. I assume he'll quickly get whatever legislation he wants sent to his desk for signature. I'm wondering how long it takes before the Senate invokes the "nuclear option" on what still requires a filibuster-proof majority to pass. | | |
| ▲ | seanmcdirmid 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | He has a one seat majority in the House. That means he needs actual complete buy in from every single Republican house member to pass something if the Democrats completely oppose it. He had more than that during his last term, so this term should be harder to get things done then last time. | | |
| ▲ | warner25 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Good point - I didn't realize that the new majorities are more narrow than they were in 2017 - but my observation is that he has more control now over these more narrow majorities. In 2017, there were still a lot of "Never Trump" or at least "old establishment" Republicans, and the party had its own brand and ideology that was distinct from Trump. That no longer seems to be the case. And the degree to which he can deploy an angry mob against any Republican that stands up to him, threatening primary challenges or worse, seems totally unprecedented to me. I say this as a registered Republican since the Bush era who has never voted for Trump. I don't feel like anyone in the party represents me anymore. | | |
| ▲ | seanmcdirmid 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | There only needs to be one Republican in the house who doesn't like the bill, and we already know that Trump doesn't do even a little bit of bipartisanship (nor I doubt he will start in this next term). He only has a couple of years to pass bills also, it is unlikely that the Republicans retain control of the house after the next midterm (unless Trump is popular). | | |
| ▲ | warner25 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm seeing 219 R to 215 D, by the way, and the one remaining vacant seat will probably go R again. Unless I'm interpreting something incorrectly(?), it doesn't look like a one-seat majority. Still more narrow than it was in 2017, as you said, but not quite that narrow. | | |
| ▲ | seanmcdirmid 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Oh, ya, now that I look at it it isn't one seat, but 5. I wonder why I thought it was one, maybe that was just for the speaker vote? Anyways, this is better for Trump, since I think 5 seats gives him something to work with. He still needs basic consensus, but one rogue house member doesn't kill everything. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | dpkirchner 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Biden will probably not enforce the ban (no fines) and Trump will likely continue that non-enforcement, essentially nullifying the will of Congress and judgement of the court. | | |
| ▲ | kshacker 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think Biden talk is a nothing burger. You need time to enforce things. Ban goes into effect on the 19th. Do they send out violation notice on 19th (Sunday), 20th (Monday and holiday and transition day) or 21st (first working day) when Biden administration does not exist. | | |
| ▲ | dgfitz 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don’t understand, why wouldn’t they send it out on the 19th? Because it’s Sunday? Laws aren’t weekday-only last I checked. | | |
| ▲ | kshacker 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes. Not all offices are open on weekends. Of course armed forces are of course police are working but should all agencies be open every day? And are they? Check your neighborhood. Post office may be open on Saturday but not Sunday and definitely not on MlK day. Check the city hall. Check the bill payment in-person windows. Check the social security agency. Some problems such as LA fires require immediate response, some problems require an escalation mechanism and many others can be dealt during regular business hours. | | |
| ▲ | dgfitz 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | A law was passed with a date attached to it, and it is very high profile. My local post office has nothing to do with anything. Stop. | | |
| ▲ | jrflowers 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think the point being made here is that many offices, including but not limited to your local post office, are closed on Sundays. They were not saying that your specific local post office is integral to enforcing the TikTok ban. Is there a section in the text of the law that says that enforcement has to happen outside of normal office hours or do you just assume that’s the case because the law is being talked about in the news? | | |
| ▲ | dgfitz 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | The law has a date attached to it. I already mentioned that. | | |
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | jrflowers 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | So do all laws | | |
| ▲ | dgfitz 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | So we agree! | | |
| ▲ | jrflowers 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | So long as we’re agreeing that they’re not doing anything because the date falls on the day before the administration is dissolved, yes! I am glad that we are on the same page that the answer to “why don’t they enforce the law that they can’t enforce” is in the question. > I don’t understand, why wouldn’t they send it out on the 19th? > "Given the sheer fact of timing, this Administration recognizes that actions to implement the law simply must fall to the next Administration, which takes office on Monday," White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a statement. | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
