▲ | amelius 12 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> (...) to North Korea, China, Russia, or Iran or an entity controlled by such a country This is very limited and will not prevent indirect sales (like we now see happening with Russian oil for example). It is also why I said "indirectly". | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | mplanchard 12 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Yeah it could be broader for sure, would prefer it to be an allowlist rather than a blocklist, but the presence of a workaround doesn't make banning something pointless, and as the SC pointed out in their decision, a law does not need to solve all problems in one fell swoop in order for it to be valid. | |||||||||||||||||
|