|
| ▲ | afavour 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It’s not the same, no. I provided the link because it’s what I assume the OP is referring to. Limiting use to 40 minutes is not a ban but it still shows a view that extended exposure to it is harmful. To turn it on its head, if more than 40 minutes is viewed harmful for Chinese youth, why not American? |
| |
|
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's a clear sign the international version of TikTok, because of it's addictiveness and content, would never be allowed for a single minute in China by the people that know the most about what it is, and what is does. What more do you need to know? |
| |
| ▲ | dv_dt 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | If it was a legal requirement for Chinese apps in China, and this is the path for societal heath then why not pass that law for all social apps in the US? | | |
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Blanket content bans are the stuff of dictatorships, but restricting access to demographics that could be most harmed by it (children for example) is a good idea, and I wish the US would look into it. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | andy_xor_andrew 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Maybe the "community notes" model isn't so bad after all |
