|
| ▲ | jeffrapp 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Easily? No. Within the bounds of the US Constitution, yes. |
|
| ▲ | coldpie 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| No. Zuck is very securely within the class of citizens that is immune to prosecution within the US. |
| |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I’m sure he’s bending at the knee right now because he feels very secure and just had a change of heart about everything precisely one month after the election. | | |
| ▲ | coldpie 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | Is he bending the knee, or dropping the mask? The billionaire+ class rightly sees this as their big opportunity to seize power for the next several generations, removing worker and consumer protections and enshrining themselves as essential parts of the government. |
| |
| ▲ | kevinmchugh 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Why is this true of Zuck but was not true of SBF? | | |
| ▲ | coldpie 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | He was just a dumb get-rich-quick kid, he didn't have any political power. Zuck has spent the past 2 decades gathering money and power. | | |
| ▲ | kevinmchugh 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | How did SBF manage to be the #2 Democratic donor in 2022 without accruing any political power? | | |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | kccoder 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Gigabillionaires with immense influence don't get prosecuted. |
