| ▲ | creato a day ago |
| This does happen, it's just done at neighborhood level. That makes some sense, the biggest fire risk factor for your house is probably your neighbor's house burning down. |
|
| ▲ | Scoundreller a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| I kinda figured it was self-destructive arson (detected or undetected) or gross negligence, and I'm mostly paying for those. Similar to when I look at causes of death for my age group and can pretty much eliminate the top 2 of 3 causes for myself. |
|
| ▲ | Ekaros a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I would actually guess that biggest risk is internal. Either faulty wiring, appliance or simple user error in kitchen or with live fire. Entire neighbourhoods burning in general is rare event. |
| |
| ▲ | consp 21 hours ago | parent [-] | | Don't know about the us but here we have fire breaks everywhere in the form of low depth waterways (non navigable). They also act as backup water reserves when the mains runs dry. So by design only parts of the neighborhood will burn down. | | |
| ▲ | aquaticsunset 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yep, those exist across the western US too. I think many people are underestimating the scale and intensity of the winds California experienced. A single house on fire with relatively regular weather conditions isn't likely to spread to others - despite the "ha American houses dumb and wood" sentiment on this topic, there are building codes and fire safety is absolutely considered. But the Santa Ana winds are extremely dry and extremely powerful. It's a hard engineering problem to solve, but an increasingly urgent one now that these major events are becoming more intense and frequent. |
|
|
