▲ | Sabinus a day ago | |
You think it's possible to put any decent percentage of our GLOBAL food production in greenhouses (remember with less light global temperatures go down) within ~6 months? Billions would perish. If the luckier rich countries did not get nuked or invaded by armies or waves of endless starving refugees then they would be able to save a good amount of their population. At best world development goes back ~50-100 years. At worst, modern civilization basically ends from the combination of conflict and famine. | ||
▲ | lazide a day ago | parent [-] | |
that doesn’t address the context of the response at all. is technology helping, or hurting in that situation? near as i can tell, it is the only thing that could help. we aso have significant food stores and buffers, and if it was the situation you described it would literally be a ‘drop everything and get working’ emergency. we’d likely do better than you expect. what else could possibly help besides technology? But yes, a lot of people would die. |