| ▲ | walrus01 a day ago |
| That's for sure not stage separation, that's an explosion from the FTS rupturing the ship tanks. |
|
| ▲ | ericcumbee a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| If it was the FTS wouldn't the flight control systems send a message back to the ground saying "things are going sideways here, FTS Activated" |
| |
| ▲ | anothertroll456 a day ago | parent [-] | | Maybe it did, or is it public that it didn't? A possible sequence (very typical in rocket failures) is: fire, engine failure(s), loss of control, rupture due to aero forces or FTS activation, explosion due to propellant mixture. Not all of these have to happen, but it's a typical progression. Before the days of AFTS the FTS activation would be pretty delayed. |
|
|
| ▲ | pixl97 a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Eh I'm thinking more it was a reentry explosion from pressurized tanks. Engines had failed a while before then. |
| |
| ▲ | s1artibartfast a day ago | parent [-] | | This is over the Bahamas. Re-entry was much further east, near Turks and Caicos Islands. Also, if a pressurized tank is reentering, that means the FTS failed to detonate. |
|