> produced "a unique" song?

People do get sued for making songs that are too similar to previously made songs. One defence available is that they've never heard it themselves before.

If you want to treat AI like humans then if AI output is similar enough to copyrighted material it should get sued. Then you try to prove that it didn't ingest the original version somehow.

▲

noitpmeder 8 months ago | parent [-]

The fact that these lawsuits aren't as simple as "is my copywrited work in your training set, yes or no" is boggling.

	▲	__loam 8 months ago \| parent [-]
		I feel like at some point the people in favor of this are going to realize that whether the data was ingested into a training set is completely immaterial to the fact that these companies downloaded data they don't have a license to use to a company server somewhere with the intention to use it for commercial use.