we're still commenting here, are we not? Despite it with almost 100% certainty being used to train AI. We're still here

?!?! Comparing and equating commenting to creative works. ?!?!

These comments are NOT equivalent to the 17 full time months it took me to write a nonfiction book.

Or an 8 year art project.

When I give away my work I decide to whom and how.

▲

CaptainFever 2 years ago | parent [-]

I have already covered these points in the latter paragraphs.

You might want to take a look at https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/shouldbefree.en.html

▲

onetokeoverthe 2 years ago | parent [-]

I'll decide the distribution of my work. Be it 100 million unique views or NOT at all.

▲

CaptainFever 2 years ago | parent [-]

If you don't have a proper argument, it's best not to distribute your comment at all.

▲

onetokeoverthe 2 years ago | parent [-]

If saying it's my work is not a "proper" argument, that says it all.

▲

CaptainFever 2 years ago | parent [-]

Indeed, owner.

Look, either actually read the link and refute the points within, or don't. But there's no use discussing anything if you're unwilling to even understand and seriously refute a single point being made here, other than repeating "mine, mine, mine".

▲

onetokeoverthe 2 years ago | parent [-]

Read it. Lots of nots, and no respect.

In the process, [OpenAI] trained ChatGPT not to acknowledge or respect copyright, not to notify ChatGPT users when the responses they received were protected by journalists’ copyrights, and not to provide attribution when using the works of human journalists

	▲	CaptainFever 2 years ago \| parent [-]
		No, wrong link. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42279218