| ▲ | JoshTriplett 7 hours ago |
| Exactly. They rushed to violate copyright on a massive scale quickly, and now are making the argument that it shouldn't apply to them and they couldn't possibly operate in compliance with it. As long as humans don't get to ignore copyright, AI shouldn't either. |
|
| ▲ | treyd 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| ChatGPT doesn't violate copyright, it's a software application. "Open"AI does, it's a company run by humans (for now). |
|
| ▲ | Filligree 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Humans do get to ignore copyright, when they do the same thing OpenAI has been doing. |
| |
| ▲ | triceratops 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | So make OpenAI sleep 8 hours a day, pay income and payroll taxes with the same deductions as a natural human etc... | |
| ▲ | slyall 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Exactly. Should I be paying a proportion of my salary to all the copyright holders of the books, song, TV shows and movies I consumed during my life? If a Hollywood writer says she "learnt a lot about writing by watching the Simpsons" will Fox have an additional claim on her earnings? | |
| ▲ | __loam 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah it turns out humans have more rights than computer programs and tech startups. |
|
