Remix.run Logo
ashoeafoot 7 hours ago

Will we see human washing, where Ai art or works get a "Made by man" final touch in some third world mechanical turk den? Would that add another financial detracting layer to the ai winter?

righthand 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That will probably happen to some extent if not already. However I think people will just stop publishing online if malicious corps like OpenAI are just going to harvest works for their own gain. People publish for personal gain, not to enrich the public or enrich private entities.

Filligree 5 hours ago | parent [-]

However, I get my personal gain regardless of whether or not the text is also ingested into ChatGPT.

In fact, since I use ChatGPT a lot, I get more gain if it is.

CuriouslyC 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There's no point in having third world mechanical turk dens do finishing passes on AI output unless you're trying to make it worse.

Artists are already using AI to photobash images, and writers are using AI to outline and create rough drafts. The point of having a human in the loop is to tell the AI what is worth creating, then recognize where the AI output can be improved. If we have algorithms telling the AI what to make and content mill hacks smearing shit on the output to make it look more human, that would be the worst of both worlds.

Retric 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The law generally takes a dim view of such attempts to get around things like that. AI biggest defense is claiming they are so beneficial to society that what they are doing is fine.

gmueckl 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That argument stands on the mother of all slippery slopes! Just find a way to make your product mpressive or ubiquitous and all of a sudden it doesn't matter how much you break the law along the way? That's so insane I don't even know where to start.

rcxdude 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Why not, considering copyright law specifically has fair use outlined for that kind of thing? It's not some overriding consequence of law, it's that copyright is a granting of a privilege to individuals and that that privilege is not absolute.

ashoeafoot 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Worked for purdue

Retric 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

YouTube, AirBnB, Uber, and many many others have all done stuff that’s blatant against the law but gotten away with it due to utility.

gaganyaan 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That is not in any way the biggest defense

Retric 5 hours ago | parent [-]

It’s worked for many startups and court cases in the past. Copyright even has many explicit examples of the utility loophole look at say: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Unive....