Remix.run Logo
stavros 7 months ago

We do it because we legitimately want them to improve, and the last resort is "if we can't work it out by X, we can no longer employ you". I don't think we've done it more than once or twice, though, because increasing the directness of the feedback that the employee is not doing well has generally worked.

icedchai 7 months ago | parent [-]

I've never seen anyone put on a PIP where the intention was anything other than eventual firing. In all these cases, the person was doing an awful job for over a year, or in some cases, since they were hired.

stavros 7 months ago | parent | next [-]

Sure, but in our company, it's different. We ended up keeping the person in one or two of those cases (I forget the numbers because there were so few).

hackable_sand 7 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Why would the company hire them then? That just sounds like emotional abuse.

icedchai 7 months ago | parent [-]

Because they did well in the interview and seemed like a good fit.