▲ | bluedino 12 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The American V8 was a high performance product at an entry level price. During the last couple years the Dodge twins got ridiculously expensive (the Challenger 392 is now almost as expensive as the Hellcat was in 2016). The problem with the turbo engines is they are way more expensive to do anything with and they come in expensive cars. BMW, Audi really being the only things that are 'fast'. Subaru, Kia, VW are all pretty much low-level performance. And then you have really expensive stuff like the Nissan GT-R. Turbo engines have been around for a long time, they're nothing new. And they have always been part of the car scene. But again, the lower price options aren't really competitive, they were at least close in the 2000's. And again, the Ford ECU has been out for two years and nobody has cracked it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | UniverseHacker 11 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I disagree on both of these. Turbo engines are usually much cheaper to tune- most of the time you can substantially increase the power with just more boost. More serious power requires a bigger turbo and bigger injectors which is still cheap and easy - an afternoon install with the engine still in the car. Tunable turbocharged European sports cars cost next to nothing once they’re a decade or two old. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|