> implying that people supportive of LGBTQ rights are (in comparison to the rest of the population) significantly more likely to be pedophiles.

Please don't put words in my mouth, but I'm sorry if anyone "accidentally" misunderstood. What I meant was that 99.9% of teenagers have had one or more contacts with a paedophile via "established" social networks.

I apologize for making multiple incorrect assumptions and for falsely accusing you of saying things you didn't say.

I misinterpreted your original message as <queer kids will be cut off from non-queer kids> and <non-queer kids will encounter fewer groomers/MAPs>. Now I understand that your message was <almost all kids will benefit from being cut off from strangers on social media> in reply to <queer kids will benefit less or be harmed>.