Everyone starts a company with the idea it may never apply to them, so why worry about it before it becomes a problem.

Of course, with the leaving tax, they may just move abroad before doing anything.

It was not that it didn't apply to me. I've had shareholdings in Norwegian companies worth well over the deductible several times. The point is that it isn't a problem in practice as long as you're aware of it and plan accordingly. Yes, if you start a company in Norway without a liquid market for your shares, and without understanding the tax implications, you might end up having a bad time of it. If you spend an hour talking to an accountant beforehand, it's just a minor extra cost of doing business.

E.g. at a $10m valuation you'll end up paying <$90k wealth tax after rebates. If your company is valued enough that your shares are worth $10m, you can finance a $90k loan either directly or via your company, and bake it into your funding rounds. Yes, it's an extra drag on your business, but from first-hand experience, preparing for this just isn't a big deal in most instances.

You don't have to like it, and people are free to whine about it, but in reality it's a problem only if you don't know what you're doing.

▲

Aeolun 7 months ago | parent | next [-]

> You don't have to like it, and people are free to whine about it, but in reality it's a problem only if you don't know what you're doing.

Maybe? Or maybe it's just a PITA that most people don't want to deal with? It's not nice when you company is doing well, and your reward is having to pay a bunch of extra taxes and deal with financing all that somehow.

At least, I find paying income/value-added tax a lot more palatable, since it's always over money you just received, not money you have to conjure into existence somehow.

	▲	vidarh 7 months ago \| parent [-]
		Of course it's not fun to have to pay. At the same time the vast majority of the wealth tax is paid by a vanishingly small proportion of society that mostly pay extremely little in income tax despite being some of the richest people in the country. It's effectively largely plugging a loophole. At the same time there is a significant social good in encouraging efficient investment of capital. If someone can't get returns sufficient that the wealth tax is nothing but a minor nuisance, it's better that capital gets distributed elsewhere.

▲

HPsquared 7 months ago | parent | prev [-]

In accounting terms I guess the tax burden just decreases the NPV of all assets.