> I'd like to see something examining the effects of those behaviors on the population.

In the testimony, they explain it:

We took a page from Big Tobacco’s playbook, working to make our offering addictive at the outset.

Allowing for misinformation, conspiracy theories, and fake news to flourish were like Big Tobacco’s bronchodilators, which allowed the cigarette smoke to cover more surface area of the lungs.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210318063530/https://energycom...

▲

cscurmudgeon 7 months ago | parent [-]

Still no science though. One exec's views in a large company doesn't equal science.

If exec's views are science/truth. Then I bet you would have found execs in tobacco companies who thought they were doing good.

▲

fsflover 7 months ago | parent [-]

True, it's not science. It is however the intention.

▲

hellojesus 7 months ago | parent [-]

> Allowing for misinformation, conspiracy theories, and fake news to flourish...

I don't understand why people are so against this? Isn't it possible that people do research to determine the validity of what they read online?

	▲	fsflover 7 months ago \| parent [-]
		Is it possible for the people to do research and avoid junk food, smoking and alcohol? (Also, to understand the danger of the climate change.)