▲ | exceptione 4 hours ago | |
(Although the response is not gibberish, I can´t feel certain that I reply to a chatgpt response (?)) You take it too static. If you are waiting for the type-safe, leak free hammered approach, you will achieve nothing. I want you to take this approach to get you going in the right direction.
- Opinion pieces are indeed a way where editorial boards go cheap, outsourcing meta thinking to external entities/influence. Those editorial boards going of the rails there is not an act of nature, but like in the case of the NYT a consequence of commercial ownership. As part of the code any opinion piece should be clearly marked as such, as well as the interests of the author.
There is no need for scalable mega media corporations. In countries with 1) public news organizations[*] and 2) required independent editorial boards, commercial titles are not as going overboard as in the US.
You can, but you can never be absolute 100% perfect.A peculiar, mindset has been programmed that ethics in society is defined in what what terms the lawyer wrote. A good society is all about what you collectively allow or disallow, no scheme, no law can perfectly defeat all bad actors all the time. The social part of "society" is an activity. If you as normal people don't show up, then it will be a Murdoch party. ___ * independent from but financed by the state |