|
| ▲ | jodleif 8 months ago | parent | next [-] |
| That’s essentially a non-choice. Also data of self-administration is probably worthless. |
|
| ▲ | nkrisc 8 months ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Step 1: Create economic conditions in which vast numbers of people can’t afford medical care Step 2: Offer them the “choice” of possibly receiving care by being medical guinea pigs for those who created the situation that deprived them of medical care in the first place. A coerced choice is a not a free choice. |
| |
| ▲ | InDubioProRubio 8 months ago | parent [-] | | A non-help, because waiting for the idealized version of help - is still less worth than a "could-help" but under coercing economic conditions. A feel-good ideological purity is less preferable outcome then a tainted Samaritan. | | |
| ▲ | nkrisc 8 months ago | parent [-] | | If it wasn't clear, my belief is that it would end up doing more harm than good, and that the status quo is the least-harm scenario between the two. |
|
|