▲ | WolfOliver 10 hours ago | |
"Until this change, customers who have used fewer resources have covered the costs, in a way, for other customers who have used much more resources." ... This argument does not make sense. I use very few resources but have to pay more. | ||
▲ | nh2 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
The argument would make sense if the prices of any Hetzner service decreased (no longer necessary to substitute high traffic users). But all prices in this message increase. | ||
▲ | aendruk 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Yeah, my price just changed from €7.05 to €8.99—in the name of fairness to low impact users? It’s brazenly nonsensical. It would be so much better if they’d just said “sorry but we need to raise prices”. The attempt to sugarcoat it is insulting to begin with, and it’s only made worse that their backwards excuse comes across as thoughtlessly trampling us. |