I would counter argue that:

1. AI generated doesn't necessarily means no quality. Especially for food recipes, the results have been outstanding

2. Google push the pages that are considered quality by users, so if they are pushed it means it would provide quality content

Do you cook by yourself? There's a point at what the preposter said: without curation or quality control.

Cooking and taste-ing is more than just throwing ingredients together. Why are there so many recipes for the very same dish and why some of the recipes get liked and used, but others don't? It's the very same dish in the end.

So, for your 1. Point, I call fake. You never know if the generated result is outstanding, when there's no quality control. Or no experienced curator who adjust the quantities of ingredients, for the dish to be more even more tasteful, or create variations of the recipes..

I think you get the idea, what I want to say.

The 2. Point is more than "stupid". First of all, to rely on goog for visibility is a bad decision. Goog just have to alter its page rank algorithm, and you're out of listing. Also, pushed content doesn't mean quality content. You may see a back fire starting from users coming to your product, trying it out and not liking it. They won't come back anymore. Like me and the genius.com lyrics site - visited it a few times, now I know it's crap and do avoid it whenever possible.

So, I think you do not cook by yourself :)