"He can’t even advise if some video game developers he represents’ multiplayer games are exempt from the ban"

There are a lot of issues with this legislation, but I'm not sure this is one of them. Games like Roblox are so exploitative, they're probably worse for children than most social media.

See, for example: https://www.eurogamer.net/roblox-exploiting-young-game-devel...

Roblox already filters out a lot of words, including links (to social media and whatnot especially). They filter so many words they may just shut down the chats entirely.

The point is not about whether video games should be exempt, it's about being able to tell whether they are covered by this law or not

I'd guess that some games should be banned too but not everything. Something like Street Fighter is widely different from Roblox for example.

The problem with a badly written law is how can you decide which is which?

I have to strongly agree here. Video games are not free from the social media problems that we are trying to free ourselves from. We also have parents and close family that have been caught in outrage nets, and who knows when, if they will ever be free? We know the pipeline for right-wing grifters.

Who doesn't have any taters in the family these days? A literal human trafficker and pimp who has been in prison is giving advice to our youth in droves. More than you will ever know. My family members stopped talking about it, and started complaining about how we can't talk about things anymore once they discovered that outside of their bubble people know what these monsters/grifters actually do.