| ▲ | MarcusE1W 7 months ago |
| My Pinephone has a switch for the microphone and also my Pinebook Pro laptop. But I also would agree that this is exotic hardware. |
|
| ▲ | whatevaa 7 months ago | parent | next [-] |
| Well i have Pinebook Pro and it's pretty much abandonware, pine doesn't do any software and OSS lacks maintainers, nobody want's it, e-waste laptop. Take it as you will. |
| |
| ▲ | KetoManx64 7 months ago | parent | next [-] | | Don't they warn you on the product page that you are buying hardware that is fully reliant on the community for functionality? That's the reason it's so inexpensive | |
| ▲ | megous 7 months ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah, that's nonsense. Pinebook Pro is well supported by Linux kernel and you can thus put any aarch64 Linux distro on it. And it's been this way for the last 3-4 years at the very least. I've been using it daily for 3 years for watching movies and main notebook while traveling. It's not at all abandonware or e-waste. |
|
|
| ▲ | lukan 7 months ago | parent | prev [-] |
| "But I also would agree that this is exotic hardware." No shit.
How is the current state btw? I suppose still not ready to be a daily driver to replace my normal phone? |
| |
| ▲ | ri0t 7 months ago | parent | next [-] | | > I suppose still not ready to be a daily driver to replace my normal phone? I'd say that depends on your definition of daily driver and/or how much compromises you're willing to take. I occasionally see members at my larger hackerspace running around with those or other seemingly "unfit" hardware and not complain too much about it ;) | |
| ▲ | megous 7 months ago | parent | prev [-] | | Kernel is in "maintenance and focussed on upstreaming" mode for a few years already, after getting nearly full HW support about 2-3 years ago. As for phone feature, reliability of that depends on reliability of firmware of the modem, which was always shaky. |
|