▲ | salutis 6 hours ago | |
Why do you think my stance is internally inconsistent? For example, I completely trust Emacs maintainers, as I have yet to see any malice or dark patterns coming from them. The same applies to other free and open source software I use on a daily basis. These projects respect my privacy, have nothing to hide, and I have no problem trusting them. On the other hand, I see more and more dark patterns coming from Apple, say when signed out of their cloud services. They pour millions into their privacy ads, but I do not trust them to act ethically, especially when money is on the table. Does this not make sense? | ||
▲ | perching_aix 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Thinking about it, I might have misunderstood what you wrote a bit. What I read was that you trust people, but then you also don't. That's not really a fair reading of what you wrote. That being said, I have seen "patterns" with open source software as well, so I'm hesitant to agree on trusting it. But that's a different problem. I also know how little hardware, microcode and firmware can be trusted, so that doesn't help either. |