▲ | CarpaDorada 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>For example, signing commits with minisign or signify. These tools don't work well with git or the git forges, and they do not work at all with fossil. (Obviously signify is a good choice if you're using OpenBSD.) Furthermore they lock you in entirely in their choice of algorithm, Ed25519, which may not be what you want (Why not Ed448?) As far as adoption goes, and adoption is hard to get going, GnuPG is what is used in Linux the most... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | stackghost 2 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Github supports GnuPG signatures" does not contradict the statement "GnuPG is trash". I will not engage further, it's obvious you are not interested in honest discussion of the technical merits. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|