Yeah its weird, because the whole point of having a system for hiring involving common questions, rubrics, etc is because at the end of the day you can either show that scoring well on the interview is correlated with higher end-of-year performance reviews or not show that and alter your interview system until it does.

Like you guys can keep posting these articles that have 0 statistical rigor. It's not going to change a process that came about because it had statistical significance.

Do remember, Google used to be known for asking questions like "How many piano tuners are in NYC". Those questions are gone not because somebody wrote a random article insulting them; they're going because somebody did actual math and showed they weren't effective.

Yes, because of Google’s rigorous hiring process they have had many successful products outside of selling ads against search…

I’ve done my stint in BigTech, most developers are not doing anything ground breaking