But that’s my point exactly. You saying “I only support the law if it’s implemented ineffectigely and my kids can circumvent it”. So what you should just be saying is that you don’t support the law.

You can be saying you support it on the condition that it’s implemented poorly enough that it should be circumventable. That just doesn’t make sense.

No, what I'm saying is, that if you think about it for more than a few minutes you realize there is no way to implement this effectively. If there was a way to do it effectively, I might consider this.