| ▲ | Deutschlandds 2 hours ago | |
You are generalizing extremly without any substinance... 1. its Googles decision to not allow this demo globally. Its a Chess Demo, what EU legal issue do you think makes this a problem? Probably NON... And yes we are not America. Our privacy is getting better protected then that of americans. Move if you don't like it or at least take the time and effort to state clearly what you don't like about certain EU regulations. | ||
| ▲ | espadrine 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
When Meta prevented the EU from using meta.ai or even downloading its vision models, I sunk my head in the AI legistation. Here, I am honestly not sure which part they rely on, to say that what they made might be unlawful. The closest thing I found for Meta was that “emotion recognition systems” are classified as high-risk (paragraph 54), and high-risk systems must have their training data disclosed (Art 11(1))[0]. In theory, you could upload photos to meta.ai and ask it what emotions are displayed, but it is already a stretch. For GenChess, I’m at a loss; it doesn’t sound like you can do that. (Not that it prevented any vision chatbot from releasing.) If someone has a better guess as to why they might have restrained it here, I am curious. [0]: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A... | ||