Maybe. They didn't seem to communicate any specific knowledge of the Java standard library. Agree an

    Optional<V> get(K) 

Java doesn't have return type function dispatch.

If you had something like:

    var x = map.get(k);

The best they could hope for is a signature like `Optional<V> getOpt(K);`. Which wouldn't be terribly bad as Java currently has an annoying get definition in the `Map` interface because it predates generics (The current signature is `V get(Object)`).

Regardless, if they do want to change the interface, it'd probably be best if they waited for Valhalla to land. One of the problems with `Optional` as it stands is it creates a load of GC pressure. If `Optional` is converted into a value class then there will be effectively no overhead to returning it everywhere.