▲ | valenterry 14 hours ago | |||||||||||||
> Can you reduce it further? What if you don't require 2 cloud providers? What if you don't need zero-downtime? I think the "2 cloud providers" criteria is maybe negotiable. Also, maybe there was a misunderstanding: I didn't mean to say I want to run it on two cloud providers. But rather that I run it on one of them but I could easily migrate to the other one if necessary. The zero-downtime one isn't. It's not necessarily so much about actually having zero-downtime. It's about that I don't want to think about it. Anything besides zero-downtime actually adds additional complexity to the development process. It has nothing to do with trying to be large actually. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | AznHisoka 14 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
I disagree with that last part. By default, having a few seconds downtime is not complex. The easiest thing you could do to a server is restart it. Its literally just a restart! | ||||||||||||||
|