| ▲ | potatoman22 10 months ago |
| You could implement some blocking HitL service/tool as an MCP server. |
|
| ▲ | dhorthy 10 months ago | parent [-] |
| ah okay - I guess in that case, I would like chain a HitL step as an MCP server that wraps/chains to another tool that depends on approval? or is there a cleaner way to do that? |
| |
| ▲ | a1j9o94 10 months ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, exactly. You would define a HitL server and the actions it implements would be API calls to your system. | | |
| ▲ | dhorthy 10 months ago | parent [-] | | this is interesting. I will have to think more about how humanlayer can support an MCP integration/wrapper, it's not immediately obvious to me i do think that AI-calling-tools is insufficient to provide bidirectional communication rails for user input/review though...not disagreeing just maybe thinking out loud a little here |
|
|
