▲ | Imperfect Parfit(philosophersmag.com) | ||||||||||||||||
11 points by diodorus 13 hours ago | 4 comments | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | dang 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Related: Nothing Personal: How ideas made Derek Parfit - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38494017 - Dec 2023 (26 comments) Derek Parfit: The Perfectionist at All Souls - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35688300 - April 2023 (21 comments) How to Be Good: The Philosopher Derek Parfit (2011) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22037240 - Jan 2020 (6 comments) Why anything? Why this? (1998) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13315746 - Jan 2017 (77 comments) Derek Parfit has died - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13304873 - Jan 2017 (38 comments) How to Be Good: Derek Parfit's Moral Philosophy - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11273495 - March 2016 (16 comments) | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | calf 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The problem with this argument is that two professors are using a PMC-type of argument about "self-regulation" theory—a pop-psych fad since the 2010's—to psychologize a peer whose behavior is more simply explained as being a creation of the philosophical-industrial complex. In trying to warn prospective readers about Parfit's books/legacy, this essay inadvertently tells on itself, it is casting judgment instead of reflecting on the madnesses of philosophy itself. It would save lay people a lot more time if they just said what was wrong with Parfit's works, rather than this thinly-veiled biographical ad hominem exercise. | |||||||||||||||||
|