▲ | nuancebydefault 8 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> invest 2x the resources into a person that will never likely tinder a significant benefit to society? So you would rather have the cleaning lady, the garbage collector, the truck driver,... not got proper read/write/calculate/economics... education and increase their chances of ending on the side where they fall for addiction instead? | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | LargeWu 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I don't think that's what they're saying. Anacostia High School in Washington DC has zero percent of students meeting expectations in Math, yet its funding per student is twice that of nearby districts that perform much better. Lebron James' I Promise Academy is similarly very well-funded both for in-classroom and wraparound services, and it's one of the worst schools in the state of Ohio. It is increasingly evident that we cannot improve student outcomes in failing schools simply by funneling more resources to those schools. Students who come from households who do not value education not only will not learn, but will also likely sabotage the education of the others in their schools. It is probably more effective to give direct cash payments to struggling families than to struggling schools. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | imron 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I expect better from someone whose user name is nuancebydefault | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
[deleted] |