That's merely syntax sugar. Haskell doesn't even have this sugar and so in a monad you have to bind explicitly, and it's fine. It's not a pyramid of doom.

▲

greener_grass 2 years ago | parent [-]

Haskell has do-notation which is a more general kind of this syntactic sugar

	▲	2 years ago \| parent \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	kccqzy 2 years ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yeah that's what I said about bind. Let's consider a language like C++ where it has none of those syntax sugars. The absl::StatusOr is a class with the idea that errors should be values. The standard library has std::expected since C++23. So where is your pyramid of doom?