This article is about people potentially losing their internet access because a media corporation decides to accuse them of something. It isn't about an internet site choosing not to broadcast them, which could be done at any time.

You're talking about someone who lost access to twitter and facebook after using them to stage a violent coup to overturn the united state election for president. That's a pretty high bar to lose your ability to access two websites.

I can't believe anyone would try to compare these two things as having anything to do with each other.