▲ | elzbardico 2 days ago | |
The 68000 was a high-end product, the 8088 was a lot cheaper, in a big part because of those design decisions, like having a 16 bit memory bus. This design allowed for a smaller chip, and keeping backwards compatibility with the 8080. | ||
▲ | jhallenworld 2 days ago | parent [-] | |
But there is more: IBM basically stole the entire CP/M software ecosystem by using the 8088: assembly language CP/M programs could be more or less just recompiled for MS-DOS. Yet, it extended CP/M by allowing you to use more than 64 KB vs. 8080/Z80. |