> I don't find any problems whatsoever in those audio

I think this is why there is no real, powerful protest against all that generated stuff. Only the people, that care, are able to articulate what's wrong with it. To me, all of AI generated content sounds horrible. To almost everyone else, this sounds ok. So we will see and hear more of this generated stuff. We are in the middle of the enshittification of all consumable media.

I think there's a lot of different reasons all simultaneously going on.

Most human musicians have very little power; that's been going away for a long time, even since "canned music" "robots" pushed live bands out of cinemas a century ago: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/musicians-wage-war-ag...

Most popular music already feels, and to an extent is, fake. Not only because mere recording allows repeated takes until it's inhumanly "perfect".

When I played an MP3 of Britney Spears to my mum around the turn of the century, she thought it was a robot singing because of the autotune.

The Monkees was famously an attempt at a manufactured band whose members just happened to not feel like playing that game and did it for real, Gorillaz is even more obviously manufactured. Parasocial relationships are inherently different from "real" relationships, but the performers have to pretend that it's personal when they address a crowd or a camera.

Axis of Awesome demonstrated the similarity of most modern hits with their "4 Chords": https://youtu.be/oOlDewpCfZQ?feature=shared

Those with the power were, possibly still are, the record labels; but if the AI are trained on the works of small musicians that can't afford the copyright cases or the political influence, but also whose works are not under the umbrella of the labels who do have those resources but not the right or short term motivation to intercede on their behalf, the big labels themselves may lose the consumer market to free AI output, while professionals will dismiss both the AI output and the label's output as "just different kinds of slop but both slop" (or whatever the current insult de jour is for AI).

Agreed. To me AI generated images look horrible, and AI generated audio is still somewhat gut twisting but less painful. AI generated code works for HTML/CSS+JS, but not that great for others. AI generated e-commerce reviews ... on par with human reviews?

I'm starting to think that what AI might be replacing is high ends of consumption, not low ends of generation. Arts has followers that are often less historically significant than genre pioneering works. Doesn't that seem like what AI is doing?

People were happy with the included wired iPhone earbuds for years, even though they were terrible.

Listening on a laptop speaker Sumo sounds fine. Listening on my wireless earbuds it is... ok. I am too lazy anymore to pull out any of my high quality wired headphones, and if somebody who used to care about sound quality enough to purchase multiple HQ headphones can't be arsed, then the general pubic really is going to think everything is just fine.

I find almost all popular music that's made in the past 20+ years quite terrible. This is not worse. For people who enjoy this chewing gum stuff, which seems most of the population of earth, this is fine. And as such, this will be all popular music in the future; upload your voice, pick a style, generate 13 songs, go on tour to make money.