CTRL+F "rust", 24 matches, I had a feeling that would be the case. What does Golang, for the most part, have to do with Rust? I also find the following bit somewhat funny:

>The success of Rust is due in large part to it being easy to adopt piecemeal and playing nice with others.

And as if Rust itself didn't suffer from the same kind of imperfections one can find in Golang. So much for that "nothing new under the sun" back in 2012! But then it starts talking about the "rust shills" boogeyman, and one has to wonder if it's not trying to justify one's choices. (which is fine, anyway) And I agree wholeheartedly to each and every single one of the "lies" listed in the article, that you could very easily rewrite half of which to fit Rust, and the other half requires no changes to apply.

> And as if Rust itself didn't suffer from the same kind of imperfections one can find in Golang.

Which imperfections are these?