| |
| ▲ | gibibit 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Linked in a the style where each word links to _a_ _different_ _page_ that doesn't correspond to the hyperlinked word. What do you call this pattern? It seems to be popular lately. I haven't been able to find a description of it, but it would be much more helpful to the reader if it was identified. Instead of > At the beginning of the year, I wrote a _bunch_ _of_ _articles_ on the various trick It's better to write > At the beginning of the year, I wrote a bunch of articles (_1_, _2_, _3_) on the various trick or something similar. | | |
| ▲ | cesarb 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | IIRC, this linking pattern was common enough back in the Geocities era, that HTML style guides explicitly recommended avoiding it. To those who lived through these times, it's quite obvious that there are three separate links, because the space between the words is not underlined (the space would be underlined if it were a single link); obviously, that trick is not helpful with the modern style of not underlining hyperlinks at all. | |
| ▲ | jmmv 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I intentionally wrote it that way because these articles are only loosely related to the one discussed here, not a "series I thought through upfront". Yeah, not a fan _of_ _the_ _pattern_, but I wanted to give it a try and see how it worked. But honestly... the text of the very first sentence talks about these articles, so the curious reader will hopefully realize that "there is something more". | |
| ▲ | marxisttemp 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | It bothers me too, in the same fashion as “click here”. Instead, we should prefer e.g. At the beginning of the year, I wrote a bunch of articles on the various tricks (_below 1MB_, _above 1 MB_, and _with GNU JMP_) Just describe the content you’re linking to. You know best as the author! |
| |
| ▲ | lproven 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Correction to the correction: with three links to the three articles. |
|
