▲ | hedora 14 hours ago | |||||||
This seems self inflicted to me. Detroit is far behind the industry leaders on EVs, and they’re pushing high-end trims with non-differentiated form factors. Ford has the F-150, which is uniquely practical, but I doubt they’ll sell many in Europe. I’m surprised there hasn’t been a land grab with different manufacturers racing to ship models that match their core competencies. For example, Stellantis has a plug in hybrid jeep, but if you want an EV for off roading your only choice is Rivian. Where are land rover and range rover? | ||||||||
▲ | tristan957 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
What is practical about the current design of the F-150? I think trucks are too large and have become a vanity symbol for most owners, especially in the city and state that I live in. I would argue the F-150 is impractical given the lifestyles of most owners in my area, which is to commute, not to haul. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | nunez 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
The F-150 Lightning has a 210-mile range in its basic trim _for a mostly empty cabin_. It goes down significantly if you haul anything. It is only practical if you either don’t use the truck for its intended purpose or you have frequent access to fast charging. |