|
| ▲ | ra7 7 months ago | parent | next [-] |
| Extremely controlled environments like the entire city of San Francisco? Sensor fusion is a thing. There are no two systems that “argue with each other”. I can’t believe the same old ignorant tropes are still making rounds. |
|
| ▲ | coolspot 7 months ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Waymos don’t drive slowly, I don’t know where you’re getting this from. If anything, they drive too fast for a thing without a driver. |
|
| ▲ | Infinitesimus 7 months ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It doesn't have to be an argument. You know what each system is good at and prioritize inputs accordingly. |
|
| ▲ | adamweld 7 months ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Nice, you just outed yourself as being completely clueless. There exist many good sensor fusion techniques for summing the output of disagreeing sensors. |
| |
| ▲ | jaimex2 7 months ago | parent [-] | | Sounds like bad designs. If you can get rid of something to reduce complexity you absolutely should. | | |
| ▲ | ra7 7 months ago | parent | next [-] | | Except when getting rid of something results in a non-working system. Reduced complexity doesn't work as evidenced by Tesla's inability to have a single driverless mile after nearly a decade of development. | |
| ▲ | olabyne 7 months ago | parent | prev [-] | | Did you forget why the 737 max had 2 crashs ?
The alert of the difference between 2 sensors didn't work / wasn't there.
So the system was relying on 1 sensor. |
|
|
