Remix.run Logo
Jtsummers 15 hours ago

The problem here is knowing customer balances. A lot of the money is still out there, but it is not properly associated with any individuals so it's infeasible (at present) to get them back their money. Which is different than what FDIC is there for, which is to insure against a bank being unable to cover deposits, but balances have been properly tracked.

If Synapse (and apparently their partner Evolve) had been moderately competent at the job they set out to do, this could have been resolved a while ago. Instead the founder of Synapse is already off to a new venture and doesn't care about the people he screwed over, though I'm sure he feels bad when asked about it. Keep failing up.

ctbeiser 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The other banks involved all agree that the remaining balances are with Evolve, and that there isn't money that's been moved somewhere else. If there was, Evolve might be willing to say where, which they've been unwilling to do so far–it's very "dog ate my homework."

Given that the depositors still have active DDA agreements with Evolve, even if they sent the money elsewhere, they still have a responsibility to provide it.

Jtsummers 15 hours ago | parent [-]

> Given that the depositors still have active DDA agreements with Evolve, even if they sent the money elsewhere, they still have a responsibility to provide it.

I didn't say otherwise. But Evolve doesn't know what money belongs to what individual customer, Synapse maintained that part of the ledger (poorly). So even though Evolve has the cash (it appears), they can't distribute it to you because they don't know how much is yours, and Synapse was such a cluster that they failed at their primary job.

deadbabe 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

He openly laughs. Scumbag.