|
| ▲ | tanduv 8 months ago | parent | next [-] |
| the library would most likely remain OSS even after the take over |
| |
|
| ▲ | dartos 8 months ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Yeah, if they don’t add malware. I doubt redis will add malware to specifically their rust client. OSS authors can add malware too. |
| |
| ▲ | whs 8 months ago | parent [-] | | The risk here is they intentionally make it incompatible with Valkey, similar to how Elasticsearch client libraries complain when a newly added slogan header is missing | | |
| ▲ | wmf 8 months ago | parent | next [-] | | That's almost guaranteed. Valkey is going to have to fork and maintain their own client libraries. | |
| ▲ | dartos 8 months ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don’t think they could do that in a way that would prevent a fork from undoing it. |
|
|